Direct: 314.345.6432

Fax: 314.480.1505

Related Industries

Food & Agribusiness

Related Services

Education

J.D., University of Oklahoma College of Law, with high honors, 1992
- Kerr-McGee Scholar
- Oklahoma Law Review, 1990-1992
The Queens College, The Queen's College at University of Oxford, 1990
B.S., Mechanical Engineering, Oklahoma State University, with honors , 1987
- Pi Tau Sigma
- Tau Beta Pi

Bar Admissions

Missouri, 1996
Illinois, 1997
Oklahoma, 1992

Court Admissions

U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois (Trial Bar), 2007
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois, 1997
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri, 1996
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma, 1992
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma, 1992
U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma, 1992
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, 2001
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, 2000

Michael R. Annis

Partner

Profile
|
News & Publications
|
Events

News

10.15.12	A Combined 84 Husch Blackwell Attorneys are Named 2012 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars in Missouri and Nebraska
8.23.12	2013 Best Lawyers Includes 106 Husch Blackwell Attorneys in 56 Practice Areas and 7 States
10.7.11	Husch Blackwell Intellectual Property Attorneys Author Patent Reform Book Analyzing Effects of Leahy-Smith America Invents Act

Publications

5.1.13	Intellectual Property Licensing and Value Issues in Bankruptcy: Assessing the Risk to Experience the Reward, AIRA Journal
9.1.12	Intellectual Property Licensing and Value Issues in Bankruptcy: Assessing the Risk to Experience the Reward, The Licensing Journal
1.1.12	Therasense v. Becton: Has the Federal Circuit Given Inequitable Conduct the Death Penalty?, The St. Louis Bar Journal
10.27.11	Prior Use Rights: A New Look to an Old Tool Provided by the America Invents Act
10.7.11	Patent Reform 2011: The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act: Commentary and Analysis
9.1.11	U.S. GAAP Requirements Related to Acquired IP: Considerations for the Licensing Professional, LES Insights
7.28.11	Patent and Trademark Office Proposes Amendments to Prosecution Rules to Address Inequitable Conduct Standard Announced in Recent Therasense Opinion
4.1.11	Planning For Litigation Over Acquired IP, Executive Counsel
3.1.11	The Role of FAS 141 Valuations in IP Litigation, Business Valuation Update
10.1.10	Intellectual Property Valuation Under U.S. GAAP and the Impact on Intellectual Property Litigation, AIPLA Quarterly Journal
1.1.91	Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.: An Analysis of Rule 11 and its Appropriate Standard of Review, Oklahoma Law Review